HANDOUT ON QUEER THEORY: EVE KOSOFSKY SEDGWICK. Assignment for next time. Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, “Introduction: Axiomatic,” Epistemology of. Epistemology of the Closet is a book published in by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, who is considered one of the founders of queer studies. In Epistemology of. Epistemology of the closct / Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, p. cm. Includes . axiomatic, that modern Western culture has placed what it calls sexuality in a more and.
|Published (Last):||15 March 2018|
|PDF File Size:||15.16 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.63 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Anonymous December 17, at 1: What’s up with this? The relation of gay studies to debates on the literary canon is, and had best be, tortuous.
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Judith Butler showed me the transformative power of the word queer
Epistemology literature books Queer studies Contemporary philosophical literature. Through this and various other examples, Sedgwick reveals that several sexual contradictions result in modern misunderstanding.
Hardwick Supreme Court decision, which upheld a Georgia sodomy law; it was overturned by the Supreme Court in by Lawrence v. It is “the open mesh of possibilities, gaps, overlaps, dissonances and resonances, lapses and excesses of meaning when the constituent elements of anyone’s gender, of anyone’s sexuality aren’t made or can’t be made to signify aximatic. However, gender is definitionally built sexuality in a way in which race and class do not have an analogue.
Roll over, Beethoven, and tell Tchaikovsky the news. The book proposes the argument that “homosexuality” is a loaded term. How do you know your sedgwkck are straight? Epistemology of the Closet has received many positive reviews.
The book’s main theme deals with the relationship between feeling, learning, and action. Topics Gender A book that changed me.
Others had imaginary friends, or teddies with personalities.
And why, finally, does Sedgwick want to avoid the debate entirely? As you may recall, Freud, in describing the contradictory logic of dreams, turns to a funny little story about a man, his neighbor, and the neighbor’s kettle:.
Epistemology of the Closet – Wikipedia
Well, Sedgwick herself married a man, Hal Sedgwick, though ssedgwick would not have used the term “straight”, seeing sexual identity as a continuum rather than a category. Axiom 1 — and I still smile at its devastatingly brilliant simplicity — is “people are different from each other”.
What does Sedgwick have to say about the relationships among and between scholars mainly interested in gender and scholars mainly interested in sexuality? As you go through the rest of Sedgwick’s essay, look to see how she illustrates and illuminates the contradictions within homophobic and indeed all hegemonic discourses. Get used to it! Why does Sedgwick take the trouble to make this point, to point out such contradictions?
Threads collapsed expanded unthreaded. It’s worth quoting a few in full: This book addresses the idea that there are two views that guide sexual identity and desire: Newer Post Older Post Home. In this chapter, Sedgwick evokes the figure of the woman who cannot know: Does she think that the contradictions work to weaken or strengthen the hegemony of homophobia?
Axiomatic by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick by on Prezi
To think, read or act queerly is to think across boundaries, beyond what is deemed to be normal, to jump at the possibilities opened up by celebrating marginality, which in itself serves to destabilise the mainstream. Retrieved from ” https: Many of the ideas in Between Men are further flushed out in Epistemology of the Closet. This page was last edited on 12 Februaryat People are different from each other. Sedgwick describes this book as the exploration of “promising tools and techniques for nondualistic thought and pedagogy.
Order by newest oldest recommendations. English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire The first book to grab me was the Butler, and this was mainly because of the resonance of the sepia-toned image on the cover of my Routledge edition, which mirrored that photograph from my childhood.
Throughout sedgqick introduction, Sedgwick refers to the debate between “essentialist” and “constructivist” views of homosexual identity or “definition. It shows a young boy standing next to a young girl, both wearing dresses complete with frills and ruffles. In the book, Sedgwick analyzes a late nineteenth century historical moment in which sexual orientation became as important a definer of personal identity as gender had been for sedgwidk.
So are the paths of auto-identification. She is wearing a pretty dress, and an alice band; a toothy grin lights up her face. In her second paragraph, Sedgwick insists on the “internal incoherence and mutual contradiction” of “commonsense views” i.